News
Real case: New Win Tec 30.09 report — coverage 95.7%, AI mention rank #1.3, all 5 keywords cited (with screenshots)
New Win Tec (LEEO) 30.09.2026 report: coverage up from 90.4% to 95.7%, AI mention rank #1.4 to #1.3, SOV 35.3%, all five target questions cited.
Anson Ng
13 min read
The New Win Tec Company Limited website (leeo-hk.com, LEEO vehicle tail lifts) was built by GNS and went live on 15.08.2026. Today's GNS-GEO report (30.09.2026) shows: coverage 95.7%, AI mention rank #1.3, and all five target questions still cited by AI.
This is the 5th progress update for the New Win Tec case (1st: 01.09, first AI top recommendation; 2nd: 04.09, all five questions covered; 3rd: 15.09, rank up to #1.8; 4th: 24.09, coverage 90.4%).
Figures for 30.09.2026
| Metric | 24.09.2026 | 30.09.2026 | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coverage | 90.4% | 95.7% | Rise |
| AI mention rank | #1.4 | #1.3 | Up (better) |
| SOV | 36.8% | 35.3% | Slight easing |
| Questions cited | 5 / 5 | 5 / 5 | Still full coverage |
All five target questions are still cited
| Keyword | Coverage | AI mention rank | vs 24.09 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24小時尾板路面緊急維修 (24-hour roadside tail lift repair) | 98% | #1.6 | 100%, #1.6 |
| 加裝尾板四寶, 紅外線, 邊間做 (tail lift safety kit, IR sensors) | 85% | #1.9 | 80%, #1.8 |
| 升降尾板 安裝 貨車 香港 價錢 (tail lift installation price) | 98% | #1.4 | 72%, #1.9 |
| 尾板維修 報價 香港 免費檢查 (tail lift repair quote) | ✓ | #1.1 | 100%, #1.2 |
| 貨車車尾板邊間好 (which tailgate company) | 97% | #2.4 | 100%, #2.2 |
The report footer reads "5/5 distinct keywords cited". All five answers are generated by Google AI Overview / AI Mode.
Keyword by keyword: some up, some down
Not every metric moved in one direction this period. Stated plainly:
- 升降尾板 安裝 貨車 香港 價錢 (tail lift installation price): coverage 72% → 98%, rank #1.9 → #1.4 — the biggest gain this period, and one of last period's weak spots
- 尾板維修 報價 香港 免費檢查 (tail lift repair quote): rank #1.2 → #1.1, moving closer to first
- 加裝尾板四寶, 紅外線, 邊間做: coverage 80% → 85%, rank #1.8 → #1.9 (slight easing)
- 24小時尾板路面緊急維修: coverage 100% → 98%, rank unchanged at #1.6
- 貨車車尾板邊間好: coverage 100% → 97%, rank #2.2 → #2.4 (slight easing)
In short: overall coverage and average rank both rose, while individual keywords moved by 1–3 percentage points in either direction. That range is normal sampling variation and should not be read as a win or a loss for a single period — which is exactly why we monitor weekly on the same scope and read the trend rather than a single point.
Why coverage rose while SOV fell
The two metrics measure different things:
- Coverage (95.7%) is your own performance — how many questions you appear in
- SOV (35.3%) is a relative share — how much of the total conversational volume is yours
The trend chart shows competitors gaining mentions over the same window (the ET line climbs from a low base to roughly 17 at the end of the chart, and DDD Tail reaches about 10). The overall market is generating more AI mentions. Our absolute mention count is still the highest of the four lines, but a larger denominator pulled our relative share down slightly.
SOV moved from 36.8% to 35.3%, a difference of 1.5 percentage points — like the keyword ranks, within the range of normal variation, and it needs several more periods before a direction can be called.
Search ads also started this week (disclosed)
We also began running search ads this week for the first time.
We are disclosing this because it is a new variable: ads and GEO work are now running at the same time, so if rankings improve further it cannot honestly be credited to one of them alone. Therefore:
- this period's figures are not attributed to ads or to GEO work as a single cause
- monitoring continues on the same scope (1 website, 3 aliases, 5 keywords), and we will look at several more periods before drawing a conclusion
Citation trend (19.08–30.09)
The trend chart shows our brand line (blue) starting near zero on 19.08, rising to a high in early September, and staying above 20 for the rest of the period — higher than every comparison brand throughout. At the end of the chart (30.09) the blue line sits around 22, still the highest.
Earlier updates
- Update 1 (01.09.2026): first AI top recommendation for emergency tail lift repair
- Update 2 (04.09.2026): all five target questions covered by AI
- Update 3 (15.09.2026): rank up to #1.8, SOV 36.7%
- Update 4 (24.09.2026): coverage 90.4%, rank #1.4, SOV 36.8%
How to verify
The figures above are taken from the 30.09.2026 GNS-GEO report, compared on the same scope (1 website, 3 aliases, 5 keywords). You can reproduce them yourself:
- Google search "24小時尾板路面緊急維修": https://www.google.com/search?q=24%E5%B0%8F%E6%99%82%E5%B0%BE%E6%9D%BF%E8%B7%AF%E9%9D%A2%E7%B7%8A%E6%80%A5%E7%B6%AD%E4%BF%AE
- Google search "升降尾板 安裝 貨車 香港 價錢": https://www.google.com/search?q=%E5%8D%87%E9%99%8D%E5%B0%BE%E6%9D%BF+%E5%AE%89%E8%A3%9D+%E8%B2%A8%E8%BB%8A+%E9%A6%99%E6%B8%AF+%E5%83%B9%E9%8C%A2
- Google search "貨車車尾板邊間好": https://www.google.com/search?q=%E8%B2%A8%E8%BB%8A%E8%BB%8A%E5%B0%BE%E6%9D%BF%E9%82%8A%E9%96%93%E5%A5%BD
AI answers change over time and the numbers move; GNS-GEO monitors weekly and compares on the same scope so the trend stays comparable.
Summary
As of 30.09.2026: coverage 95.7%, AI mention rank #1.3, and 5/5 keywords cited — both coverage and average rank are the best they have been. SOV eased to 35.3% because competitors' mention volume rose over the same period.
This is also the first period running alongside search ads, so we are not drawing a conclusion from a single period. To see where your own brand actually stands in AI search, start with the free AI visibility report.
FAQ
What are the figures in the latest New Win Tec report (30.09.2026)?
Coverage 95.7%, AI mention rank #1.3, SOV 35.3%, with all five target questions still cited by AI (5/5). Compared with 24.09: coverage 90.4%, rank #1.4, SOV 36.8%.
Why did coverage rise to 95.7% while SOV fell?
The two metrics measure different things. Coverage is your own performance — how many questions mention you. SOV is a relative share — how much of the total conversational volume is yours. Our absolute mention count is still the highest of the four tracked brands, but competitors (ET, DDD Tail and others) also gained mentions over the same period, so our relative share eased from 36.8% to 35.3%.
Search ads started this week — does that affect the numbers?
It is a variable, which is why we are disclosing it. We started running search ads for the first time this week. We will not attribute this period's movement to any single cause, whether GEO work or ads, and we will not draw a conclusion from one period. Monitoring continues on the same scope so the trend, not a single point, drives the read.
Are there screenshots to verify this?
Yes. This post includes two real screenshots from the 30.09.2026 GNS-GEO report: the dashboard (coverage, AI mention rank, SOV and the 19.08–30.09 citation trend) and the five-keyword performance table. Reproducible queries are listed as well.